Webex Testing¶
5.1 Webex Threat Model¶
Architecture Components Under Test:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ABHAVTECH WEBEX COLLABORATION ARCHITECTURE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ WEBEX CLOUD SERVICES │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Webex │ │ Webex │ │ Webex │ │ │
│ │ │ Calling │ │ Meetings │ │ Contact Ctr │ │ │
│ │ │ (3,200 usr) │ │ (Enterprise)│ │ (175 agents)│ │ │
│ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ SIP Trunk │ HTTPS │ HTTPS/SIP │ │
│ └─────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┼───────────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ ON-PREMISES INFRASTRUCTURE │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Expressway-C/E │ │ CUCM 14.x │ │ Cisco Unity │ │ │
│ │ │ (Hybrid) │ │ (Migration) │ │ Connection │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ (Voicemail) │ │ │
│ │ │ • Mobile/Remote │ │ • 3,200 phones │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ • B2B Calling │ │ • SIP trunks │ │ • Voicemail-to- │ │ │
│ │ │ • MRA │ │ • Call routing │ │ Email │ │ │
│ │ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ SIP/TLS │ SCCP/SIP │ SMTP │ │
│ └───────────┼──────────────────────┼─────────────────────┼──────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ Mobile Users Desk Phones Email System │
│ (Remote Access) (8861, 9971) (M365 Exchange) │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Attack Surfaces:
| Component | Attack Surface | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Webex Calling | SIP trunks, call routing, PSTN gateway, toll fraud | HIGH - Financial impact |
| Webex Meetings | Meeting IDs, passwords, participant enumeration, zoom-bombing | MEDIUM - Privacy/disruption |
| Webex Contact Center | Agent accounts, supervisor access, call recording, PCI compliance | HIGH - Customer data exposure |
| Expressway-C/E | Mobile/Remote Access (MRA), B2B calling, certificate trust | MEDIUM - External attack surface |
| CUCM | SIP trunks, phone registration, dial plan manipulation, eavesdropping | HIGH - Voice infrastructure |
| Unity Connection | Voicemail access, PIN codes, voicemail-to-email | MEDIUM - Information disclosure |
5.2 Webex Test Cases¶
Test Case 1: SIP Trunk Hijacking (Toll Fraud)¶
Objective: Attempt to exploit SIP trunk to place unauthorized calls (especially international toll fraud).
MITRE ATT&CK: T1499 (Endpoint Denial of Service), T1078 (Valid Accounts)
Test Methodology:
-
SIP Trunk Enumeration:
-
SIP Registration Attempt:
- Attempt to register SIP phone/trunk without authentication
-
Expected Result: SIP registration requires authentication (401 Unauthorized)
-
Weak Authentication Brute Force:
- If SIP digest authentication enabled, attempt password cracking
-
Expected Result: Strong passwords resist brute force (20+ chars, complex)
-
Toll Fraud Simulation (CONTROLLED TEST):
- If valid credentials obtained (or test account provided), place test call to international number
- Monitor call detail records (CDR) in CUCM
-
Expected Result: Call restrictions block unauthorized international calls
-
Dial Plan Exploitation:
- Attempt to dial out using special prefixes (9, #, *, etc.) to bypass restrictions
- Expected Result: Dial plan properly restricts access (partitions, calling search spaces)
Success Criteria: - ✅ SIP trunk requires authentication (no anonymous calls) - ✅ Strong passwords prevent brute force - ✅ Call restrictions block unauthorized international destinations - ✅ Dial plan partitions prevent privilege escalation
Detection Validation: - CUCM CDR: Failed call attempts logged - Splunk alert: "SIP authentication failures from IP X.X.X.X" - XDR correlation: "Toll fraud attempt - multiple international call failures" - Financial monitoring: No unexpected international call charges
Detailed Test Procedure: See Appendix H (Note: Actual toll fraud charges avoided by using test destinations or immediate call termination)
Test Case 2: Webex Meeting ID Enumeration¶
Objective: Attempt to enumerate valid Webex meeting IDs to join unauthorized meetings.
MITRE ATT&CK: T1087 (Account Discovery), T1589 (Gather Victim Identity Information)
Test Methodology:
- Meeting ID Structure Analysis:
- Observe meeting ID format (e.g., 123-456-789, 9-digit numeric)
-
Determine if IDs are sequential or random
-
Brute Force Enumeration:
-
Expected Result: Rate limiting blocks enumeration (CAPTCHA, IP blocking)
-
Password Bypass Attempt:
- For meetings requiring password, attempt common passwords (123456, meeting, abhavtech)
-
Expected Result: Strong password policy enforced (10+ chars, complexity)
-
Participant Enumeration:
- If joined meeting as guest, attempt to enumerate participant names/emails
- Expected Result: Host controls (lobby, waiting room) prevent unauthorized access
Success Criteria: - ✅ Meeting IDs use random generation (not sequential) - ✅ Rate limiting prevents brute force enumeration - ✅ Password policy enforces strong passwords - ✅ Lobby/waiting room prevents unauthorized join
Detection Validation: - Webex admin portal: Failed join attempts logged - Splunk alert: "Meeting enumeration attempt detected - IP X.X.X.X"
Detailed Test Procedure: See Appendix I
Test Case 3: Toll Fraud Detection Validation¶
Objective: Validate that Webex Calling toll fraud detection mechanisms are functional.
MITRE ATT&CK: T1499 (Endpoint Denial of Service)
Test Methodology:
- Abnormal Call Pattern Simulation:
- Place rapid successive calls to international destinations (within rate limits to avoid actual fraud)
-
Monitor if system detects abnormal pattern
-
After-Hours Calling Test:
- Attempt to place international calls during non-business hours (2 AM IST)
-
Expected Result: After-hours restrictions block calls
-
Call Volume Threshold Test:
- Simulate high call volume from single user (within safe limits)
-
Expected Result: Alerting triggers for unusual call volume
-
Geographic Anomaly Test:
- Call from user account located in Mumbai to unusual destinations (e.g., North Korea, Iran)
- Expected Result: Geographic restrictions block calls to sanctioned countries
Success Criteria: - ✅ Toll fraud detection alerts on abnormal patterns - ✅ After-hours restrictions functional - ✅ Call volume thresholds enforced - ✅ Geographic blocking prevents calls to high-risk destinations
Detection Validation: - Webex Admin Portal: Toll fraud alerts generated - Splunk: "Toll fraud pattern detected - User: user@abhavtech.com" - Email alert to finance/security teams
Detailed Test Procedure: See Appendix J
Test Case 4: SBC/CUBE PSTN Gateway Security ← NEW in v2.0¶
Objective: Test security of on-premises SBC/CUBE PSTN gateways that provide telephony connectivity for cloud Webex Calling services.
MITRE ATT&CK: T1499 (Endpoint DoS), T1078 (Valid Accounts), T1557 (Adversary-in-the-Middle)
Infrastructure Scope: - NJ Data Center: CUBE-NJ-01/02 (AT&T SIP trunk) - Mumbai Data Center: CUBE-MUM-01/02 (Tata Communications SIP trunk) - London Data Center: CUBE-LON-01/02 (BT SIP trunk)
Test Methodology:
- SIP Authentication Bypass:
- Enumerate SIP trunk endpoints (svmap, nmap)
- Attempt SIP INVITE without credentials
- Brute force SIP digest authentication (sipcrack)
-
Expected Result: Rate limiting blocks brute force (10 attempts → IP block)
-
Toll Fraud Simulation:
- Automated dialer to premium-rate international numbers
- 15 calls to high-cost destinations (Somalia, Grenada, premium services)
-
Expected Result: Toll fraud detection blocks calls, auto-suspends extension
-
DoS Attack (SIP Flooding):
- SIPp flood: 100 INVITE messages/second for 100 seconds
-
Expected Result: Rate limiting throttles to 20 calls/sec, attack source blocked
-
PSTN Carrier Trunk Hijacking:
- Attempt carrier IP spoofing (Scapy packet crafting)
- Send INVITE claiming to be from carrier gateway
-
Expected Result: Mutual TLS + IPsec source validation blocks spoofed traffic
-
Media Plane Eavesdropping:
- Capture RTP packets during active call (tcpdump)
- Attempt SRTP decryption (Wireshark)
- Expected Result: All media encrypted with SRTP (AES-128), keys protected by TLS
Success Criteria: - ✅ SIP authentication enforced (no anonymous calls) - ✅ Toll fraud detection functional ($120K/year savings validated) - ✅ DoS protection maintains 99.99% uptime - ✅ Trunk hijacking prevented (mutual TLS + IPsec) - ✅ Media encryption validated (SRTP, TLS key exchange)
Detection Validation: - CUBE syslog: "SIP authentication failure from IP X.X.X.X" - Splunk alert: "Toll fraud attempt - Extension suspended" - XDR correlation: "Distributed SIP attack from multiple sources" - ServiceNow: Auto-incident creation for toll fraud (INC-XXXX)
Detailed Test Procedure: See Appendix P (NEW in v2.0)
5.3 Webex Configuration Hardening Recommendations¶
Webex Calling Hardening:
| Configuration | Current State | Recommended State | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIP Trunk Authentication | Digest authentication | Certificate-based auth (TLS client certs) | HIGH |
| Call Restrictions | Basic international blocking | Geographic blocking (allow only approved countries) | CRITICAL |
| After-Hours Calling | Unrestricted | Block international calls 2000-0600 IST | HIGH |
| Toll Fraud Detection | Manual CDR review | Automated alerts (Splunk correlation, >$100 in 1 hour) | CRITICAL |
| PIN Policies | 4-digit voicemail PIN | 6-digit minimum, no sequential/repeated digits | MEDIUM |
Webex Meetings Hardening:
| Configuration | Current State | Recommended State | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting Passwords | Optional | Mandatory for all meetings, 10+ chars complexity | HIGH |
| Lobby/Waiting Room | Disabled by default | Enabled by default, host approval required | HIGH |
| Recording Consent | Manual announcement | Automated banner: "This meeting is being recorded" | MEDIUM |
| Screen Sharing | All participants | Host/co-host only (prevent hijacking) | MEDIUM |
| Meeting Expiry | Meetings remain active indefinitely | Auto-expire after 1 hour past scheduled end time | LOW |
Webex Contact Center Hardening:
| Configuration | Current State | Recommended State | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent Authentication | Password + MFA (Duo) | Certificate-based auth for supervisor accounts | MEDIUM |
| Call Recording | Encrypted in transit | Encrypted at rest (AES-256), access logging | HIGH |
| PCI Compliance | Pause recording during credit card input | DTMF masking (credit card digits not recorded) | CRITICAL |
| Supervisor Monitoring | Silent monitor allowed | Require agent notification (compliance) | MEDIUM |